KRFL - a football simulation league
Forums
KRFL :: Forums :: KRFL Forums :: 2016 League Business
Proposed Rule Change - Eliminate in-season trading << Previous thread | Next thread >>
Moderators: noodles, MarkB
Author Post
Salem
Tue Apr 05 2016, 02:56p.m.
Registered Member #25
Joined: Sun Sep 07 2008, 10:07p.m.

Posts: 763
Current Rule
7.1 – In-Season trading is allowed between the opening of the season and the trade deadline set by the NFL, currently week 8.


Proposal:
7.1 - In-Season trading is not allowed

Explanation:
As people have mentioned in my previous post, the simplest way to make sure these lopsided trades don't happen is to eliminate in-season trading. There are a few reasons for this...

1) The current system is setup so there is no incentive to win, but there is an incentive to get something back for your stud players who are at the end of their contracts. An example I have cited is a 10 rated player getting traded for a 4th round pick.

2) Our in-season trades are unrealistic. It is extremely rare for stud players to be traded mid-season. It just doesn't happen like it happens here.
Back to top
mark
Tue Apr 05 2016, 05:34p.m.
Registered Member #45
Joined: Wed May 05 2010, 11:29p.m.

Posts: 831
I support this.
Back to top
PapaBear53
Tue Apr 05 2016, 06:25p.m.
Guest

The RatPack endorses this
Back to top
MarkB
Tue Apr 05 2016, 07:21p.m.
Mark Blume

Registered Member #81
Joined: Mon Oct 14 2013, 08:54a.m.

Posts: 1985
I am against this. I am in this league as much for the fun of being a general manager of a team and managing salaries and a roster as being a game coach.
Back to top
mark
Tue Apr 05 2016, 09:07p.m.
Registered Member #45
Joined: Wed May 05 2010, 11:29p.m.

Posts: 831
Create an alternative rule that will address the issue.
Back to top
noodles
Thu Apr 07 2016, 02:16a.m.
Webmaster

Registered Member #1
Joined: Mon Feb 18 2008, 02:12a.m.

Posts: 1270
It seems we have two alternatives - 1) eliminate in-season trading altogether or 2) reduce the in-season salary cap. I think both proposals should be made. The second is a half-step solution that would be moot if the first also passes.
Back to top
sjenk
Thu Apr 07 2016, 11:56p.m.
Registered Member #73
Joined: Sat Mar 30 2013, 01:40a.m.

Posts: 226
Opposed to eliminating trades. Would agree with reducing the in-season cap to $83M. Would also propose trading be limited to a 2 or 4-week period prior to Week 6 once season begins
Back to top
 

Jump:     Back to top

Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System